Although I feel that it probably is a sign that I am catching up on my blogged past, I have to admit that I face the fact that the next thing in my blog pile is the International Medieval Congress of three-and-a-half years ago with a certain unwillingness. I mean, I’ve spent much of the last two years either trying to stay off or being told I can’t go onto the campus where it happened, for a start, so there is definitely a sense that this is deep past which doesn’t have so much to do with time as experience. But I’ve done all the rest and the format for them seems pretty well worked out now, and so I will give it a go.
Postcard advertisement from the IMC website
This was, I am reminded as I fish the programme off the shelf, the 25th International Medieval Congress, and the programme is the fattest of all the ones on that shelf. I can’t actually work out how many sessions there were: it says that there were 392 sessions on the conference theme of Memory, 9 keynote lectures and 394 further sessions, plus 4 lectures, so I think it’s 799, but firstly I’m not sure if that was everything and secondly, that was the programme as initially published, not the result of all the subsequent changes you find in the also-thick booklet of changes when you register. And in any case, however many sessions there are, you still can’t go to more than 17 because that’s how many slots there are in the programme, which is massively parallel, and most delegates won’t manage that because of their feeble needs for food and sleep or because of wisely placing socialising with people you otherwise never see over more direct forms of academic engagement. I do like, however, how this means that it’s probably mathematically possible for more paths through the Congress to exist than there are attendees, since there were this year 2,545 attendees and, if my GCSE maths does not fail me, 1 x 53 x 1 x 54 x 54 x 13 = 2,009,124 possible combinations of sessions just on the Monday not including any of the receptions. How would we know if it got too big? Anyway, this just means that what I have done the last few times, just listing my own path and then offering a few remarks where things still stand out for me, seems like the best approach still, because I can’t give an impression of 2 million plus possible other Congress experiences in one blog post, now can I? So mine is below the cut, day by day with brief commentary on each day to lighten the data dump. As ever, I’m happy to try and answer questions about the papers if people have them, but I will try and stay short unless you do. Here we go! Continue reading →
Posted in Anglo-Saxons, Carolingians, Catalonia, Charters, Eastern Europe, France, General medieval, Institutions, Islamic Crescent, Now working on..., Spain
Tagged agriculture, al-Andalus, Alans, Alex Woolf, Andre Evangelista Marques, Andrew Marsham, Ann Christys, Augustine of Hippo, Aurora González Artigao, Álvaro Carvajal Castro, conferences, Cullen Chandler, Danuta Shanzer, Ed Roberts, epigraphy, Fozia Bora, Ghali Adī, Guillermo Tomas Faci, Ian Wood, Ibn Khaldūn, Igor Santos Salazar, IMC, inventories, Ionuţ-Valentin Cucu, Jana Valtrová, Jeffrey Bowman, Jesús Lorenzo Jiménez, José Carlos Sanchez-Pardo, Julia Smith, Katy Cubitt, land use, Leeds, Leonor Zozaya-Montes, liturgy, Magdalena Betti, Marcos Fernández Ferreiro, Maria Soler Sala, Marta Sancho, Martha Bayless, Mary Carruthers, medieval economy, memory, Merovingians, Molly Lester, Mongols, Paul Fouracre, Paulo Pacha, place-names, Portugal, Purificación Ubric, Richard Dance, Rob Portass, Rory Naismith, Ros Faith, Sarah Greer, Simon MacLean, St Wilfrid, tax, Vladimir Liščak, Wendy Davies, Xavier Costa Badia
I don’t know about you, but in the current medical and economic climate, I am finding my identity as a researcher quite hard to maintain. As Dirk Gently would have put it, its waveform has collapsed. I have been letting correspondence about research projects and plans drop, just because I can’t see through to a point where they will be practical again, and I was already doing this before the pandemic to be honest. I am also, concomitantly, finding it increasingly hard to engage with the research that people are still managing to do, or at least present, like the recent virtual International Medieval Congress, which I didn’t attend. I mention this mainly because it’s one reason I’ve found it hard to get round to writing this post about the 52nd International Congress on Medieval Studies at Kalamazoo in 2017; I was there and I learnt things and I had fun, although I wasn’t really presenting anything new, but it seems very far from what matters now. But maybe that means it’s important to retain, and in any case it did happen, however unlikely that large a gathering now seems. So here we are, an account. Continue reading →
Posted in Carolingians, Crusades, England, France, Frontiers, General medieval, Islamic Crescent, numismatics, Spain, Vikings
Tagged Alcuin, Alice Blackwell, Andrei Gândilâ, Andrew Holt, Aragón, Ariana Myers, Baltic, bishops, Brittany, Calabria, Carine van Rhijn, Catherine Karkov, Chris Wickham, Christopher Guyol, conferences, Damián Fernández, Danielle Bradley, Eleanor Rosamund Barraclough, Elva Johnston, gender history, Graham Barrett, Greenland, Gregory Leighton, Gregory of Tours, Guy Halsall, Helen Foxhall Forbes, Hildemar of Corbie, horses, Hundred Years War, Iona McCleery, Ireland, James Schryver, Jamie Wood, Jane Sancinito, John of Salisbury, John-Henry Clay, Kalamazoo, Lee Mordechai, Mallorca, Max McComb, medieval literature, Merovingians, Molly Lester, Nicole López-Jantzen, Pablo Poveda Arias, Patrick Wadden, periodisation, Peter of Duisburg, Portugal, Rebecca Devlin, Regan Eby, Rory Naismith, Rosalind Bonté, Scotland, Sueves, Sunny Harrison, Templars, Teutonic Knights, Theodulf of Orléans, treasure, Trevor Smith, Valerie Garver, Vanessa Wright, Visigoths, West Africa