Teaching resumed on Monday, and who knows how long I can keep up blogging under one of my heavier loads so far in this post? But I have one post ready, which I put into draft in the beginning of April 2016, when I was clearing messages off an old phone. Some of the messages came from a period when I was marking exam scripts by first-year undergraduates completely new to medieval history—not at my current institution I should point out, but long in the past—and as anonymous to me then as they are to you now. I evidently had to share the pain with someone, and now it seems wrong not to disperse it more fully before they pass into oblivion. I mean, each one is a gem in its way. I have grouped them by their particular sort of failing. All spellings were authentic and hopefully still are. I hope I didn’t teach any of them and wish them all well in their current lives.
Sadly not really getting it
These are probably our fault as teachers, really, but we certainly had help.
“Christainity often faced mass persecution in early medieval era. In 64 AD the first account of Christain persecution took place as Christains were blamed for the Great Fire of Rome.”
“Without the Silk Roads, the development of the world may not have been so fast.”
Words that sound about right
“There is evidence of this available from primary sources such as Byzantium coins being found in areas of China during the Confucian dynasty…”
Yes, Confucian is what this smells of to me too.
I don’t think these were our fault, though, I think these were students being afraid of us marking them wrong.
“The emergence of Christianity would have been a great change as many places had been pagan prior to their conversion.”
Almost all, really!
“… arguably the most important prophet of Islam…”
It’s hard to think of one more so!
“It is possible that in the eighth century there was a different view on what was true.”
That is indeed a problem we face.
Not what you meant
Here, if anyone is to blame, it’s whoever taught the writers writing.
“Muslim women had a great hurdle in overcoming their participation in the intellectual and political institutions of Islam…”
Some of them, indeed, never managed it. And this one is my favourite of all.
“Buddhists were not large enough to cause mass conversions.”
No comment needed.
What do you mean?
“The advent of Muslim women’s success in overcoming their challenges was hindered at the advent of Prostitution and that it was widespread in Provincal cities that had monitered brothels.”
I understand most of where this came from, except how the Muslims got back to Provence so quietly, but I don’t understand where it was trying to go.
“With a long-lasting peak of 1600 years, the Silk Routes, or Silk Roads, are heavily attributed for their ability to connect the unknown world.”
Good to know. I think.
Over time, I have developed a reputation as a tough marker. I offer these, then, as partial explanation of how I might have got that way and ask for the ones that weren’t funny enough to quote also to be taken into consideration…
Pingback: Surely you’re mistaken I | A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe
Pingback: Surely you’re mistaken II | A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe